Website Youtube GitHub

mGear Framework Forum

mGear spline components give strange joint transforms

I was working with the chain_IK_spline_variable_FK_01 component and found that the final joint output was giving much poorer results than an ordinary spline IK solver. I then tested all the other spline components (chain_FK_spline, chain_spline_variable…) and found they were generating the exact same behavior.

When binding joints to a spline IK solver, each joint always points along the path to the next joint so that each joint is only translated along its X axis. When using the mGear solution which attaches joints to a motionPath, you get the joints oriented at various tangents of a spline. Since the tangent does not point directly toward the next joint, you get translation in the Y and Z axes of each joint. The result is that the transforms of each joint do not blend nicely into one another like they do with a standard spline IK. It’s possible to get a smooth looking output by smoothing the skin weights until they’re all blurred together, but my current task (custom wing component) requires more rigid weighting between the joints.

Is there a solution to this? I was considering swapping my component to use a standard spline IK solver instead.

This does seem wrong and possibly a bug. I wonder if there is an index offset somewhere in the component.

Here is a rough quick fix you could consider if you’re in a rush. Below each FK control is an empty transform. You can aim those to the next FK controller. In my aimConstraint I use “none” as an upvector, but since they are parented under the FK controls, I think they should remain stable without an upvector. And twisting still appears to work correctly.

You might have to adjust those commands to match your naming conventions properly.

import pymel.core as pm

chainRefs ='chain_C0_*_scl_ref', type='transform')

fkControls ='chain_C0_fk*_ctl', type='transform')

for chainRef, fkControl in zip(chainRefs, fkControls[1:]):

This is not a bug. Is how the rollSplin solver interpolate. I think I have the explanation somewhe in one of the videos. But I will try to illustrate here the difference.

How to do the skinning:

remember some components use Maya spline solver. it is up to you what to choose :wink:


Thank you @chrislesage and @Miquel, I completely understand now. Using the offset weighting does give better results that are comparable to spline IK. It does make rotation with the FK controls a bit strange though, since the rotation center is changed. (Screenshot attached) I think to write my component, the best solution is spline IK, so I’ll take a look at arm_2jnt_freeTangents.